home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nntp.onyx.net!claymoor
- From: Adam.Morris@octacon.co.uk (Adam Morris)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: ANSI C++ Draft question
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 96 14:50:06 GMT
- Organization: Octacon Ltd
- Message-ID: <4fuvlt$9li@mulgave.octacon.co.uk>
- References: <DMFKzA.Jru@iquest.net> <DMHDt7.L7t@research.att.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: claymoor.onyx.net
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
-
- In article <DMHDt7.L7t@research.att.com>,
- ark@research.att.com (Andrew Koenig) wrote:
- >In article <DMFKzA.Jru@iquest.net> bjones@sams.mcp.com (Bradley L. Jones)
- writes:
- >
- >> Does the ANSI C++ Draft standard define operator precedence? I couldn't
- >> find this defined anywhere and need to verify the operator precedence for
-
- Try section 5 (unfortunately it does say that order of evaluation is not
- specified but does mention precedence in some of the subsections on operators)
- C++ Problem Solving and Programming by K. A. Barclay and B.J.Gordon has an
- appendix listing operator precedence but I don't know how well it conforms to
- the standard and not just current practice. It's by Prentice Hall ISBN
- 0-13-126673-X
-
- >It's still available for ftp from research.att.com, directory dist/c++std/WP.
-
- That's just the draft standard which I assume he has...
-